top of page

“Brendan won!” Appeals court affirms decision by judge to overturn Dassey’s conviction

CHICAGO — The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday, June 22nd affirmed a decision by a judge to

overturn Brendan Dassey’s conviction, according to Dassey’s attorney. The three-judge panel said Dassey was coerced into confessing and should be released from prison.

Dassey’s attorney, Steven Drizin, posted to Twitter Thursday indicating the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a decision by Judge Duffin — 2-1.

Drizin said “This round goes to Brendan Dassey 2-1,” with Judge Hamilton dissenting.

The final judgement issued by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals says:

“The decision of the district court is affirmed, with costs, in all respects. The writ of habeas corpus is granted unless the State of Wisconsin elects to retry Dassey within 90 days of issuance of this court’s final mandate, or the Supreme Court’s final mandate. The above is in accordance with the decision of this court entered on this date.”

Duffin on November 14th ordered the release of Dassey, ruling he be freed under the supervision of the US Probation Office after overturning his confession in August — saying investigators coerced Dassey, who was 16 at the time, and suffered from cognitive problems, into confessing.

The state appealed that ruling.

In 2005, Dassey, then 16, confessed to authorities that he assisted his uncle, Steven Avery, in raping and killing photographer Teresa Halbach, who went missing on Halloween in 2005. Her charred remains were found in November 2005 on Avery family property in Manitowoc County, Wisconsin.

The case was chronicled in the controversial 10-part Netflix series “Making a Murderer,” which suggested that investigators took advantage of Dassey’s youth and limited intellect to coax him into confessing to a crime he didn’t commit. Court documents stated that Dassey IQ’s was “assessed as being in the low average to borderline range.”

Dassey, who has been incarcerated at a state prison in Wisconsin, serving a life sentence, later recanted.

Judge Duffin overturned Dassey’s conviction in August, citing the manner in which the confession was attained. He called it “so clearly involuntary in a constitutional sense that the court of appeals’ decision to the contrary was an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law.”

“The court’s decision rests on a fundamental principle that is too often forgotten by courts and law enforcement officers:

Interrogation tactics which may not be coercive when used on adults are coercive when used on juveniles, particularly young people like Brendan with disabilities,” said Dassey’s attorneys, Steven A. Drizin and Laura Nirider, in August.

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in February as to whether Dassey’s confession should stand.

Judge Ilana Rovner questioned State Attorney Luke Berg.

Attorney Berg: “Brendan Dassey chose to confess, to release those terrible images of Teresa Halbach that were haunting him. The investigators encouraged him to get it out, but did not put on any undue pressure.”

Judge Rovner: “Mr. Berg, help me with this. If a police officer says to someone who’s being interrogated, ‘let’s get it all out today, and this will be all over’…I want you to imagine a 16-year-old with a very low IQ. That is extremely suggestable.”

A three-judge panel questioned Berg for 20 minutes. Then it was Laura Nirider, Dassey’s attorney’s turn.

Attorney Nirider: “‘We already know what happened,’ they said. And still, they offered him leniency. This message was repeated not once, not twice, but an accumulative drumbeat.”

The family of Teresa Halbach sat in court listening. At the end of the statements, the state offered this final thought. Attorney Berg: “He remembers her screaming ‘help me’ and seeing her naked and chained to the bed. He remembers her crying and pleading with him to stop while he raped her. He remembers her breathing after Avery stabbed her in the stomach.”

The former special prosecutor at the time Dassey was convicted spoke after the oral arguments were complete.

“There was no coercion on any occasion which would cause the statement to be tainted at all,” said Ken Kratz.

In February, there was no timetable as to when a decision could be made.


Monitor FOX6 News and for updates on this developing story.

Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page